Purpose

This task gives a step-by-step template demonstration for learners preparing to meet the unit outcomes. It contains three assessor-provided sample forms (risk assessment, inspection sheet, environmental aspects register) with a model example filled in line-byline. The materials show how to complete forms correctly, common mistakes to avoid, and how to meet compliance expectations.

Alignment to unit learning outcomes

• Develop and implement current ISO standards for occupational health and safety. Evidence-based reference: ISO 45001:2018 is the current OHS management standard used for system design and implementation.
• Evaluate strategic risks using a quantifiable risk assessment system. Practical guidance and templates follow HSE and ISO good practice for risk identification, evaluation and prioritisation.
• Articulate risk communication strategies in various situations. Guidance on safetycritical communications and risk communication principles is provided for normal operations and incident response

How the task is used by assessor and learner

The assessor supplies the blank templates and a completed model. The learner studies the example and then completes the same forms for a different workplace scenario. Assessment checks:

• Correct use of definitions (hazard, consequence, control).
• Use of a quantifiable matrix (likelihood × consequence) to prioritise actions.
• Evidence of ISO-aligned processes: context, leadership, planning, operational control, performance evaluation.

Part A — Risk assessment template (blank) — fields and short instruction

Fields (column headings) the assessor will provide:

• Task/Location
• Step or activity (short phrase)
• Hazard (describe what can cause harm)
• Who might be harmed (roles/groups)
• Consequence (brief: type of harm)
• Likelihood (numeric 1–5; 1=rare, 5=almost certain)
• Severity / Consequence score (numeric 1–5; 1=minor, 5=fatal)
• Risk score (Likelihood × Severity)
• Existing controls (what is already in place)
• Additional action required (what needs to be done)
• Action owner (job title)
• Target date
• Review date / Monitoring notes

Short instruction for the learner: Use factual, workplace-specific language. Choose numeric likelihood and severity consistently. Apply hierarchy of controls (eliminate, substitute, engineering, administrative, PPE). Document monitoring and verification of controls.

Part A — Model example (completed line-by-line)

Task/ Locatio n

Step or activity

Hazard

Who might be harmed

Conseque nce

Likeli hood (1–5)

Seve rity (1–5)

Risk score

Existing controls

Additional action required

Action owner

Target date

Review

Corridor 1F

Replace fluoresce nt tube in ceiling luminaire

Working at height, ladder slip, falling object

Maintenance electrician, passing staff

Fracture, head injury

3

4

12

Use of good condition step ladder; trained electrician; area cordoned; safety boots; task permit

Use mobile elevated work platform (MEWP) instead of ladder where available; confirm ladder inspection record; spotter to control pedestrian access

Maintenance Supervisor

5 working days

Review after task completi on; check incident log

Notes on completed line:

Likelihood 3 = possible given previous near misses; severity 4 = major injury possible. Multiply to give 12 (medium– high risk). Prioritise engineering control (MEWP) before administrative. Record evidence that hierarchy was applied.

Common mistakes to avoid:

• Leaving controls vague (write exact measures, e.g., “use MEWP type X, operator trained to IPAF standard”).
• Using inconsistent scoring scales without noting criteria.
• Omitting review/monitoring evidence.

Part B — Inspection sheet (blank) — fields and instruction

Fields:

• Site/Area  Date/time  Inspector name & role
• Item/Equipment inspected (short code)
• Condition observed (pass/fail or description)
• Immediate hazard? (Yes/No)
• Action required (describe)
• Priority (High/Medium/Low)
• Responsible person
• Completion date  Verification / Close out remarks

Instruction:

Use objective language. Where a fail is recorded, specify who will fix it and by when. Attach photos when possible. Record verification evidence after corrective action. Refer to relevant statutory requirements or company standards.

Part B — Model example (completed line-by-line)

Context:

Weekly site safety inspection for electrical workshop.

Site/ Area	Date	Inspector	Item	Condition observed	Immediate hazard?	Action required	Priority	Responsible	Completion date	Verification
Electric al worksh op	2025 -1110	HSE Inspe ctor (nam e)	Portable applianc e tester (PAT) not labelled	Some tools have no PAT tag for >12 month s	Yes	Remove untagge d tools from service; schedule PAT test for all portable tools	High	Worksh op Supervi sor	202511-12	PAT report attached; items relabelled 2025-1112

Notes:

• Immediate hazard column must be used to trigger swift action.
• Attach the PAT test certificate to the inspection record. Document how controls were verified

Common mistakes to avoid:

• Recording observations without a required action or owner.
• Marking “closed” without verification evidence (signature, date, photo, certificate).

Part C — Environmental aspects register (blank) — fields and instruction

Fields:

• Activity / Process (where aspect arises)
• Aspect (what element interacts with environment)
• Impact (what could happen to the environment)
• Legal / regulatory requirement (applicable law, permit)
• Current controls / mitigation measures
• Severity (1–5) and Likelihood (1–5) or significance ranking method
• Environmental significance (High/Medium/Low)
• Action required / Improvement plan
• Owner
• Review date

Instruction:

Follow ISO 14001 practice when identifying aspects and evaluating significance. Consider life cycle, frequency, scale and stakeholder concerns. Link significant aspects to objectives and operational controls.

Part C — Model example (completed line-by-line)

Context:

Construction compound for small refurbishment project.

Activit y / Proces s	Aspect	Impact	Legal requirement	Current controls	Severity	Likeli hood	Significa nce	Action required	Owner	Review
Fuel storage for site plant	Fuel spill from storag e drum	Soil and water contaminatio n; local pollution	Fuel storage regs; waste disposal law (local)	Bunded storage; spill kit; monthly checks; staff training	4	2	8 Medium	Install secondary containme nt with 110% bund capacity; update spill response drill	Site Manager	6 month s

Notes:

• Legal/regulatory field must cite the regulation code or permit number.
• Significance requires clear numeric method; keep method consistent across register.

Common mistakes to avoid:

• Mixing “aspect” and “impact” descriptions. Keep aspect as activity/element; impact as environmental change.
• Not linking significant aspects to measurable objectives and monitoring.

Risk communication strategy guidance (short practical plan)

Purpose:

Communicate risk information so that the audience understands risk, actions and responsibilities.

Core steps:

• Identify stakeholders (workers, supervisors, contractors, visitors, regulators).
• Select message and level of detail for each stakeholder. Use plain language for workers; provide technical detail for managers and regulators.
• Choose channels: toolbox talk, safety bulletin, email, signage, SMS for urgent messages, incident debrief meetings.
• Confirm receipt and understanding: use short quizzes, return-demonstrations, signatures on permits.
• Provide feedback loop and update messages as new information arises.
• Record communications as part of assurance (meeting minutes, signed attendance sheets).

Example scenario:

Elevated risk after a near miss with scissor lift.

• Message to operators: immediate stop work, inspect lift, follow lockout procedure. Delivery: safety stand-down and toolbox talk, supported by written brief and signed attendance.
• Message to senior management: summary of event, root cause analysis timeline, proposed changes, request for resources. Delivery: short report and meeting.

Common mistakes to avoid:

• Overloading operators with technical jargon.
• Failing to record that communications occurred.
• Not using multiple channels for critical messages.

Assessment guidance for assessor (how to judge learner evidence)

The learner should submit:

• A completed risk assessment for a real or provided scenario, with clear scoring, hierarchy of control applied, action owners and review evidence.
• A filled inspection sheet showing observation, corrective action and verification.
• An environmental aspects register with at least five aspects, significance ranking and linkage to controls.
• A short risk communication plan for at least two different stakeholder groups using plain English and records of delivery.

Marking criteria:

• Accuracy of definitions and scoring (consistent use of scales).
• Evidence of ISO alignment: leadership, planning, operational controls, performance evaluation.
• Practicality and traceability: named owners, dates, verification evidence.
• Quality of communication: clarity, records, suitable channels.

Final notes and quick checklist for learners

• Use real evidence: photos, certificates, attendance sheets.
• Always show hierarchy of control when reducing risk.
• Keep numerical scoring method documented and consistent.
• Link significant environmental aspects to objectives and legal requirements.
• Record risk communications and verify understanding.